This Web Accessibility icon serves as a link to download eSSENTIAL Accessibility assistive technology software for individuals with physical disabilities.

FEATURES













American Indian Population Is Mostly in Midwest
By Daryl C. Hannah - Nov 4, 2008
Photo

Keywords: American Indian, Native American, population, cultural diversity, Indian land, tribe

Editor's Note: There are various ways to view the American Indian population. The numbers used for this story are backed by both the U.S. Census Bureau and the Selig Center for Economic Growth. They include the Alaska Native population. Please note that the term "declining" refers to the percentage of American Indians relative to the U.S. population, not the raw number of American Indians.

 

 

Many Americans know little about American Indians outside of the film "Dances with Wolves" or the Atlanta Braves' tomahawk chop. And what people are even less familiar with is the shrinking of the American Indian population.

 

The U.S. population of American Indians dropped 4.3 percent between 2000 and 2006. They currently represent only 0.8 percent of the entire U.S. population.

 

While the overall population is shrinking, certain areas have seen a spike in American Indians. Texas had a 130 percent increase in the American Indian population from 1990 to 2007. The American Indian population in Mississippi grew more than 77 percent during the same period.

 

And they're taking their dollars with them.

 

As we begin American Indian Heritage Month, consider this: In 2007, the states with the largest American Indian markets were California, Oklahoma, Texas, Arizona, New Mexico, North Carolina, Washington, Alaska, Florida and New York, totaling $35.5 billion. These states claim 62 percent of the American Indian population's $57.1 billion in buying power.

 

Other states have also seen a rise in this group's population. West Virginia, Tennessee and Georgia have all witnessed more than 300 percent growth in the past 10 years.

 

Here are more interesting facts about American Indians:

 

·         In 2007, the 10 states with the largest American Indian markets were, in order: California ($8.5 billion), Oklahoma ($5.9 billion), Texas ($4 billion), Arizona ($3.8 billion), New Mexico ($2.7 billion), North Carolina ($2.3 billion), Washington ($2.1 billion), Alaska ($2.1 billion), Florida ($2.1 billion), and New York ($2 billion); 44 percent of American Indian buying power was concentrated in the five largest American Indian markets. (Source: Selig Center for Economic Growth)

 

·         From 1990 to 2007, the 10 states with the most growth of American Indian buying power were, in order: West Virginia (419 percent), Mississippi (368 percent), Texas (350 percent), Florida (336 percent), Tennessee (323 percent), Georgia (313 percent), Kentucky (284 percent), Colorado (278 percent), Iowa (274 percent), and South Carolina (263 percent). (Source: Selig Center for Economic Growth)

 

·         In 2007, the 10 states with the largest American Indian shares of total buying power were, in order: Alaska (9.1 percent), Oklahoma (5.4 percent), New Mexico (4.8 percent), South Dakota (3.5 percent), Montana (3.4 percent), North Dakota (2.6 percent), Arizona (2.1 percent), Wyoming (1.2 percent), Nevada (1 percent), and Washington (1 percent). (Source: Selig Center for Economic Growth)

 

·         American Indians represent 0.6 percent of the U.S. work force; 0.3 percent are American Indian men and 0.3 percent are American Indian women. (Source: U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission)

 

·         American Indians represent 0.4 percent of U.S. managers. (Source: U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission)

 

·         A total of 12.1 percent of the American Indian population attained a bachelor's degree or higher in 2000; the national average is 24.4 percent. (Source: U.S. Census Bureau)

 

·         A total of 14.8 percent of the American Indian population were veterans in 2000, compared with 14.5 percent of the total U.S. population. (Source: U.S. Census Bureau)

 

·         A total of 38.5 percent of the American Indian population has disabilities, compared with 27.3 percent of the total U.S. population. (Source: U.S. Census Bureau)

 

Readers' Comments

Your opinions and thoughts...
Posted Wednesday Nov 5, 2008 by Guest;

This article is absolutely not true. The reason the government says the population is dropping is because they refuse to count al of us thousands and thousands of Indians that are NOT Federally recognized. Were ANY Indians any less Indian Befroe the Federal Government recognized? Were they not Indians until the Government said they were? Absolutely not. Some of us have no interest in recieving anything FROM the government but the right to say WHO WE ARE! We have made it just fine for over 200 years without any help from anyone. Why would we need it now, just don't ignore us because we are not sitting on a reservation with our hands out waiting for something from the Government. I AM CHEROKEE by birth, and this can be proven by birth and death certificates right back to the Cherokees living in my state in the late 1700's and early 1800's. We are here and we are many !!!!!!!!

.
Posted Tuesday Nov 25, 2008 by Guest;

 Thanks to the 2000 census, we can now check all that apply regarding our ancestry. Finally I can say I am Spanish and Cherokee. When you had to choose only one, is was unfair to biracial/multi-ethnic people, who had to pick one. I can claim to be Cherokee on Federal census forms regardless of the fact that I am one of the undocumented and am not a card- carrying member of a recognized tribe. I am undocumented because my ancestors chose to claim to be white (rather than be removed to OK while still being registered on the rolls) so as not to be separated from their Scots-Irish spouses and biracial children. It was a big family secret, but I broke the code and got confirmation from my aunt in 1995. I am proud of my heritage and it is unfortunate my family had to choose to be "white" rather than being proud of their heritage. I know who and what I am, even if I am still not a card-carrying member of a recognized tribe. Eventually I will be able to prove I am Cherokee, by genetics, where written records have failed me in proving my ancestry. If I can prove I am related by blood to a member of a recognized tribe, that should be enough. Any Davis family members in the Eastern or Western bands of the Cherokee want to help me? It only takes a cheek swab. Please do away with the blood quantum crap, if we can prove we are related with DNA, to a Cherokee tribal member, that should be sufficient for tribal membership. Tribal membership has shrunk because those with less than a certain blood quantum do not count as tribal membership, simply because they choose to procreate with non-tribal members.

.
Posted Wednesday Dec 3, 2008 by Guest;

 I agree with the previous article that the percentage of Native American population is shrinking because the government does not recognize those who are not tribal members. My grandmother was born in 1879. Her mother was Native American. The family did not claim to be Native American because to do so was to risk losing their land and having their children be treated unfairly. My family and I are not tribal members, although my father is eligible for tribal membership. Nevertheless, we try to uphold the Native American values passed down to us and to make choices, when voting and otherwise, that support the fair treatment of Native American people.

.

Comment on this article   
Name:
E-mail Address:
Comments:*


Career Search


Quick Search Advanced Search