This Web Accessibility icon serves as a link to download eSSENTIAL Accessibility assistive technology software for individuals with physical disabilities.

FEATURES











Be notified when we post new LGBT History Month articles on our website!
We will not sell or share your email address, ever! Please read our Privacy Policy.
Lesbian & Gay Marriage Now Legal in Vermont; Who's Next?
By Daryl C. Hannah - Apr 8, 2009
Photo Also read: LGBT, civil unions, same-sex marriage

Vermont is now the fourth state to allow same-sex marriage, joining Massachusetts, Connecticut and Iowa, and the first to do so with a legislative vote.

The state legislature in a 25-3 vote overrode the governor's veto of the same-sex-marriage bill, allowing lesbian and gay couples to marry and enjoy the same rights as heterosexual couples. 

Click here to read "Where Is Same-Sex Marriage Gaining Steam?"

Click here to read "Vermont Gov. Will Veto Same-Sex Marriage."

Click here to read "Lesbian & Gay Marriage Legal in Iowa--47 More to Go."

"It's a great day for equality," State Rep. Margaret Cheney, a Democrat from Norwich, told The New York Times. "People saw this as an equality issue, and we're proud that Vermont has led the way without a court order to provide equal benefits."

Regional LGBT activists have waged a campaign to make same-sex marriage legal in all New England states by 2012. 

What's more, on Tuesday, the Washington, D.C., City Council, which is the local government, voted 12-0 to fully recognize same-sex marriages legally entered into in other jurisdictions. This is one step closer to allowing same-sex nuptials in the nation's capital. 

Council member David Catania, who is openly gay and has promised to introduce a marriage-equality bill later in 2009, lauded the vote as "the march toward human rights and equality." Readers' Comments

Your opinions and thoughts...
Posted Friday Apr 10, 2009 by Guest;

It's about time. I'm glad that some states are recognizing the inequality of human rights. I'm glad that some states are recogning the need for gay-marriage. Duh? Marriage and its benefits for all citizens.

.
Posted Tuesday Jun 30, 2009 by Guest;
Dear all,I suggest that we (journalists, gay activists, reporters, readers etc...) try to be careful with the way we write articles regarding or talk about civil rights update. Very often, it has been written and said that same sex couples have the same civil rights than heterosexual couples in connecticut, iowa, massachussets and once upon a time in California. This is not true. Even in these states, same sex couples are still not granted over 1100 civil rights provided by the federal state. (civil rights such as immigration rights to sponsor your foreign partner for permanent residency, federal tax laws for married couples etc....) I wish we would be more careful and be more precised to offer readers a clearer picture of where the LGBT stands. With more and more readers trying to understand why the LGBT community is trying so hard to get the same civil rights than other american citizens, let's try to be clear and let them understand that even if we can marry in certain states, we still don't have any federal civil rights that comes when you are legally married to your partner. As a matter of fact, same sex couples are granted with no federal civil rights at all if they get married. .
Posted Sunday May 9, 2010 by Guest;
Its a step in the right direction at least! But I agreee there are many more rights for gays that need to be enforced.

Comment on this article   
Name:
E-mail Address:
Comments:*


Be notified when we post new LGBT History Month articles on our website!
We will not sell or share your email address, ever! Please read our Privacy Policy.
Subscribe to the print edition of our magazine: Click Here To Subscribe

Career Search


Quick Search Advanced Search