This Web Accessibility icon serves as a link to download eSSENTIAL Accessibility assistive technology software for individuals with physical disabilities.

FEATURES











Work/Life Programs Thrive During Recession
By C. Craig Jackson - Dec 22, 2009
Photo

Also read: corporate diversity, work/lifeDiversityIncBestPractices


"Being a flexible employer tends to pay off for the business." Employer-based survey results, actual practices and several new bills support this notion advocated by Ellen Galinsky, president of the Families and Work Institute.


Survey Results


A survey of 400 employers conducted by the Families and Work Institute in New York found:


* 81 percent of employers have kept their existing work/life programs such as reduced hours, phased retirement, compressed work weeks and telecommuting
 

* 94 percent of employers have added to their existing work/life programs, while 6 percent have eliminated their work/life arrangements

To find out what work/life benefits are hot this year, watch our work/life balance webinar featuring Johnson & Johnson and PricewaterhouseCoopers.

In the survey, employers with more than 1,000 employees (16.5 percent of total employers) have increased their work/life programs by 25 percent and 37 percent have used flexible work/life arrangement to reduce layoffs. This occurs even though 66 percent of these employers report declining revenue over the past year and 64 percent of employers who have cut costs have reduced their work force.


Legislation


According to the Families and Work Institute, Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y., and chair of the Joint Economic Committee, has introduced two pieces of relevant legislation:


* The first, the Working Families Flexibility Act, would require employers to meet with and consider proposals by any employees seeking flexible work/life arrangements such as adjustments in the number of hours or days worked or location of employment. There is no requirement, however, that such a request be granted.
 

* The second would grant federal employees up to four weeks of paid leave when they become parents. This bill already passed the House 258-154 on June 4.


Another piece of legislation currently on Capitol Hill would grant employees up to seven paid sick days annually. Rep. Rosa DeLauro, D-Conn., who authored the bill, reported that nearly half of the private-sector companies lacked paid sick days. Rep. Lynn Woolsey, D-Calif., said that "only 8 percent of workers have paid family and medical leave."


Actual Practices


Galinsky says, "A number of employers have recognized that if they provide flexibility, they can save jobs." The DiversityInc Top 50 Companies for Diversity® are industry leaders in providing progressive work/life benefits. Consider:


* 100 percent of DiversityInc Top 50 companies offer telecommuting, flexible hours and domestic-partner healthcare benefits for same-sex partners


* More than 80 percent of DiversityInc Top 50 companies offer adoption assistance, job sharing, paternity leave and dependent-care benefits such as childcare and eldercare


* More than half of all DiversityInc Top 50 companies offer other work/life benefits such as alternative career tracks for parents or others with long-term family-care issues, retirement transition such as part-time or virtual work, and paid time for volunteering/community outreach


For more from the Families and Work Institute, click here.
 

For more statistics on the DiversityInc Top 50, e-mail benchmarking@DiversityInc.com.

Readers' Comments

Your opinions and thoughts...
Posted Wednesday Aug 19, 2009 by Guest;
Workplace flexibility measures are fantastic. I am happy to see that more businesses are catching on. But workplace flexibility cannot be forced onto businesses. Some businesses simply cannot afford to give their employees several weeks of paid leave, and it is wrong for the United States to mandate that they do so. The United States can increase flexibility by loosening federal regulations instead of tightening it. Lets do that instead. Businesses in the private sector should be allowed to let their hourly workers choose comp time in lieu of overtime pay. This is still outlawed by the federal government. The federal government allowed their hourly workers this option in 1978, but it is still illegal for the private sector. What's wrong with that picture? The federal government should allow private sector businesses as much flexibility as possible so that they can still thrive in this economy. At the NCPA we are fighting hard for increased flexibility!.

Comment on this article   
Name:
E-mail Address:
Comments:*


Career Search


Quick Search Advanced Search