This Web Accessibility icon serves as a link to download eSSENTIAL Accessibility assistive technology software for individuals with physical disabilities.

FEATURES











Does McDonald's Web Site Stereotype Blacks?
By the DiversityInc staff - Aug 25, 2009
Photo

Also read: multicultural missteps, McDonald's, diversity training, branding, marketing, Blacks


Editor's Note: This article was edited Aug. 27 to include McDonald's statement on 365Black.com.

McDonald's web site for the Black community, 365Black.com, is the subject of online furor from bloggers and social-network users, who deem the site offensive and say it perpetuates stereotypes about the Black community.

McDonald's Chief Marketing Officer Neil Golden sent DiversityInc the following statement:

At McDonald's, we always listen to our customers, taking their feedback and perspectives into consideration. It is never our intent to offend anyone. We know that many of our customers enjoy an interaction with our brand that goes beyond mcdonalds.com. That is why we offer people with diverse interests an opportunity to interact with our brand in ways that may be different from how others experience McDonald's. We proudly support programming for African American, Asian and Hispanic consumers, as well as sites designed to provide families and sports enthusiasts with engaging brand experiences, while also providing information about our food, programs and social responsibility. All of McDonald's Web sites link to McDonalds.com, which provides any visitor with a wealth of information about our company. 365Black.com was launched in 2003 as part of the overall 365Black program that recognizes the contributions that African Americans make across the country. We respect that there are differing opinions. As a company, we're proud of our long history of diversity and inclusion as evidenced by McDonald's restaurant staff, owner/operators, suppliers and corporate employees. We will continue to explore ways that help us to maintain a relationship with our customers and that enable them to connect with our brand in a way that is meaningful to them.

Their issue is that the web site doesn't reflect the diversity of the Black community and that in the execution of this web site, McDonald's is positioning itself as an expert on the Black community, which the company is not.

DiversityInc cannot assess the accuracy of McDonald's commitment to the Black community since the fast-food giant chose this year for the first time in recent years not to participate in The DiversityInc Top 50 Companies for Diversity® and we do not, therefore, have their data to assess.

How can you avoid multicultural missteps? Learn how DiversityInc Top 50 companies brand themselves as diversity leaders and see best practices for cultural sensitivity at DiversityIncBestPractices.com.

McDonald's spokesperson Julie Pottebaum tells DiversityInc she does not have a statement addressing this specific issue but that McDonald's is working on a statement to address these concerns. Chief Marketing Officer Neil Golden, in a statement to Time, said the company was "proud to celebrate the diversity of our customers who reflect the diversity of our society." He praised the site, calling it a place where customers can "meet real people who's [sic] lives have been touched by McDonald's."

The viral campaign against the site began to spread late last week, when Muhammad Saleem, the director of social media strategy for the Chicago Tribune's Chicago Now, posted a link to the web site on Digg.com. By Sunday, 365Black was the second most-popular site on Digg.com and quickly became a trend on Twitter, according to Time.com. The anger over the site continued to grow on Monday as commentators discovered an additional McDonald's web site targeting the Asian community, named MyInspirAsian.

"Even if the idea was a good one and truly was promoting Black cultural heritage, it really does come off as manipulation and stereotyping," says Saleem. "It's part of a larger problem: McDonald's doesn't have the sort of brand loyalty and trust to be able to have this sort of campaign and have it be embraced."

Is this another example of an ethnic marketing misstep? McDonald's recently was in the news for distributing Happy Meal toys that offended American Indians.

McDonald's six-year-old web site, which, according to the site, is intended to "celebrate Black history 365 days a year," features testimonials about experiences at McDonald's, as well as scholarship information and job opportunities.

But all the testimonials are from Black employees, customers or contest winners. The partnerships feature only Black actors. One page even draws an analogy to the African Baobab tree, saying, "like the unique African Baobab tree, which nourishes its community with its leaves and fruit, McDonald's has branched out to the African-American community nourishing it with valuable programs and opportunities." And for some, that was the final straw.

Writers at Steel Closet, a multi-interest blog, wrote: "I'm not the crazy activist type who gets all riled up when I see an offensive ad. In fact, I welcome some insensitivity if the laugh is big enough. But I had to do a double-take with this one. McDonald's actually WENT THERE with its 365 Black Campaign. The premise of it is to celebrate Black pride and culture and dedicate 365 days to it, rather than just your standard Black History Month."

He continued: "In theory, this campaign is a good thing and could potentially help further a community that has been historically disenfranchised. In practice, its genuineness just falls apart for a number of reasons. The main one is McDonald's being a huge corporation not historically known for adamantly fighting for civil rights. More accurately, one would suspect McDonald's is actually attempting to capitalize on the Black community's historical disenfranchisement to sling some burgers."

Social-networking users on other sites demanded a site called 365White or a 365Hispanic.

Readers' Comments

Your opinions and thoughts...
Posted Tuesday Aug 25, 2009 by Guest;
Informative Article. But that's about it. Do you have an opinion? If so, state it. I checked out the two websites and see no problem with the micromarketing attempt. But who am I? I look to DiversityInc to start the conversation. I may agree or disagree, but at least there is something. The content as of late has been really watered-down. What's up? I know you have talented resources at that company. Allow them to shine.I'll check back. .
Posted Tuesday Aug 25, 2009 by Guest;
I was surprised at the comments made by Muhammad Saleem and Craig Brimm as it seems like after viewing 365Black.com there comments are perhaps more of a jealousy as it seems the people who may be viewing McDonalds website may not be viewing the one's they represent. It's sad to see a positive thing that McDonalds is doing being perceived as negative, I thought the site was well put together, informative, and very user friendly. Unfortunately Diversity Inc. only seems to focus on the negativity and selects a few "extremists" to get comments from to create a story, pretty sad... .
Posted Tuesday Aug 25, 2009 by Guest;
I see nothing wrong wit this website. It just needs more interactive items.
Posted Tuesday Aug 25, 2009 by Guest;
The problem, in my opinion, has less to do with stereotyping and more to do with the fact that McDonald's is using a seemingly good intention (celebrating the Black community) to take advantage of people (by selling them crappy food that causes obesity). Celebrating the cultural heritage of a community should not be used as a pawn to sell burgers. It's dishonest and disrespectful. .
Posted Wednesday Aug 26, 2009 by Guest;
I guess I get where you're trying to go with the article ... but, honestly, i don't think you get there. McDonalds Corporation - like Apple, ATT, Ford, GM et al - really only exist for their shareholders. Their down with Diversity to the extent that engaging with Diversity will increase their return to those shareholders. I can applaud MacDonald's' efforts to celebrate Black History, but I'd rather they ignore Back people and we them. As a population that disproportionately experiences obesity, high blood pressure and diabetes, the Black community would be better off eating the containers McDonalds packages its products in rather than the high sodium/high trans fat entrees and the fructose laden desserts (of course McDonalds isn't the only culprit... fast food in general is killing us).I realize that since diversity is in your publication's name that it is your primary focus. However consider this: if McDonalds were to participate in your Top 50 program and were to come out as number one, would that make their products any less damaging to the health of the Black community? .
Posted Wednesday Aug 26, 2009 by Guest;
Lol, black people perpetuate stereotypes about the Black community. I am so over claiming somebody bringing me down or calling me the N word behind my back. We got people that come from other countries and can barely speak English but somehow end up doing okay and we been here over 400 years give or take, willingly or not. It may be time to start looking at ourselves for our own problems. McDonald's has probably done more for black folks than any other restaurant chain. Some issues are not about race, but rather lack of judgment, marketing skills, or communication. May want to check out who actually set up 365Black.com. May have been ---- a black person? .
Posted Wednesday Aug 26, 2009 by Guest;
I agree w/Mr Wllms and Ms Lockhart, I think we have MORE issues w/nutrition and business opportunities. For what its worth, McD's has made more opportunities happen to black folk than a WHOOOOLE lotta companies! And 360Black is a better inclusionary attempt than most I've seen...... Baba Tonney .
Posted Saturday Dec 19, 2009 by Guest;
For the record: I found nothing wrong with the website. As a matter of fact I saw the site as much as a year prior to this "controversy" and agreed with its message and understood its purpose. My blog merely showed an opposing quote from another blog. The people here at diversity were kind enough to remove the erroneous attribution of this opposing quote this article..

Comment on this article   
Name:
E-mail Address:
Comments:*


Career Search


Quick Search Advanced Search