This Web Accessibility icon serves as a link to download eSSENTIAL Accessibility assistive technology software for individuals with physical disabilities.

FEATURES











Limbaugh Dropped From NFL Bid, He Says, Because Liberals Don't Want Mainstream Conservatives
By the DiversityInc staff - Oct 19, 2009
Photo

Also read: Rush Limbaugh, Barack Obama, football, accountability

"It has become clear that [Rush Limbaugh's] involvement in our group has become a complication and a distraction to our intentions, endangering our bid to keep the team in St. Louis," said Dave Checketts, chairman of the St. Louis Blues and head of a partnership that had included the talk-show host. "As such, we have decided to move forward without him and hope it will eventually lead us to a successful conclusion."

Limbaugh claims to be mainstream. Is he? Click here to read our article.

Limbaugh's reaction? "This is not about the NFL, it's not about the St. Louis Rams, it's not about me," reports ESPN. "This is about the ongoing effort by the left in this country, wherever you find them, in the media, the Democrat Party, or wherever, to destroy conservatism, to prevent the mainstreaming of anyone who is prominent as a conservative."

During his show Wednesday, Limbaugh added, "This is the latest in a long line of attempts by the left to discredit any of us who believe what we believe."

The criticism over Limbaugh's involvement in the bid actually began from people inside the NFL. It started when NFL Players Association Executive Director DeMaurice Smith sent an e-mail to the executive committee opposing Limbaugh's involvement. "Sport in America is at its best when it unifies, gives all of us reason to cheer, and when it transcends. Our sport does exactly that when it overcomes division and rejects discrimination and hatred," Smith wrote.

Indianapolis Colts owner Jim Irsay added, "I myself couldn't even think of voting for him … I'm very sensitive to know there are scars out there. I think as a nation we need to stop it. Our words do damage and it's something that we don't need. We need to get to a higher level of humanity."

This was followed by a statement from Commissioner Roger Goodell on Tuesday: "I've said many times before, we're all held to a higher standard here and I think divisive comments are not what the NFL is all about," reports The Washington Post. "I would not want to see those kinds of comments from people who are in a responsible position in the NFL, absolutely not."

Limbaugh was briefly an NFL commentator in 2003. But he was forced to resign after a remark he made about Philadelphia Eagles quarterback Donovan McNabb touched off controversy: "The media has been very desirous that a Black quarterback do well …There is a little hope invested in McNabb, and he got a lot of credit for the performance of this team that he didn't deserve. The defense carried this team," Limbaugh said at the time.

What kinds of comments in the workplace constitute harassment or create a hostile work environment? For the difference between compliance and real inclusive training, go to www.DiversityIncBestPractices.com/training.

Several players opposed Limbaugh's bid as well, including Mathias Kiwanuka (Giants), Bart Scott (Jets) and Justin Tuck (Giants).

Defensive end Kiwanuka said to The New York Daily News: "He can do whatever he wants. It is a free country. But if it goes through, I can tell you where I am not going to play. I am not going to draw a conclusion from a person off of one comment, but when it is time after time after time and there's a consistent pattern of disrespect and just a complete misunderstanding of an entire culture that I am a part of, I can't respect him as a man."

Former NFL tackle Roman Oben said in The Washington Post: "In a league of professional athletes who are mostly African American and come from humble backgrounds, a Limbaugh-owned Rams team would neither elicit the warmest reception by the players in the locker room, nor would it attract the free agent who is weighing options on his NFL future."

In the NFL, 67 percent of the players were Black in the 2008 season, according to a report by The Institute for Diversity and Ethics in Sport at the University of Central Florida. The NFL has made great strides in hiring Black head coaches as well. In the 2009 season, 27 percent of the new head coaches were Black.

A Move to Prevent Conservative Mainstreaming—or a Business Decision?

If the deal had gone through, how would have St. Louis Rams sponsors, such as American Airlines, McDonald's and Energizer and new NFL sponsors U.S. National Guard, Gillette and restaurant chain IHOP reacted?

Consider how advertisers have reacted to FOX's "Glenn Beck Program." According to Color of Change, 62 advertisers have decided to pull spots on Beck's show since this past summer after he called President Obama a racist with "a deep-seeded hatred for white people." Beck also said: "I'm not saying he doesn't like white people, I'm saying he has a problem. This guy is, I believe, a racist."

The pull-out began with Procter & Gamble (No. 11 on The DiversityInc Top 50 Companies for Diversity® list), followed by General Mills (No. 47 in the DiversityInc Top 50, Kraft Foods (one of DiversityInc's 25 Noteworthy Companies), SC Johnson (No. 46 in the DiversityInc Top 50), Walmart and other companies.

Although the Checketts group will move forward on the bid without Limbaugh, other buyers are interested in the team, including Black businessmen Donald Watkins and Dave Steward, reports ESPN.

For in-depth research on inclusive internal and external organizational communications, visit DiversityIncBestPractices.com.

Your opinions and thoughts...
Posted Friday Oct 16, 2009 by Guest;
The problem isn't that Limbaugh is a "mainstream conservative." He's not, but most of the other team owners are. The problem is that he is -- if not an outright racist, which he may well be -- notorious for making irresponsible, divisive, comments. This is America; he has every right to express his outrageous, ill-founded, opinions. But, others, likewise, have the right to hold him accountable for his past conduct and statements..
Posted Friday Oct 16, 2009 by Guest;
The problem is not about this guy. It is about those who in effect, are silencing him. America is not for everyone. It is not for those who inadvertently or intentionally attempt to stop anyone from expressing their views. This is the issue, and the only issue. Freedom of speech is based upon property rights which have been violated horrendously in this case. The offense is against every American. Those who try to silence another's opinion have no business living among us. There is room for them in every other country, including Canada and Mexico. They should proceed to the exits as fast as their bigoted legs can carry them..
Posted Monday Oct 19, 2009 by Guest;
Isn't it convenient to champion diversity, if the opinions agree with yours, but if someone thinks differently, the champions of diversity slam them. Liberals act like they have a monopoly on diversity, but are not accepting of other opinions. Would liberals object strenuously to an attempt by Rev Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson to owning an NFL team? They have both made several racist statements in the past, but they get a pass. Why is the NFL trying to add more black coaches and not more white players. Is it convenient to rate players strictly on talent and not coaches?.
Posted Monday Oct 19, 2009 by Guest;
Limbaugh is right. Mc Nabb has not lived up to expectations, However, I don't believe anyone deliberately wanted hims to succeed becasue he was black. He was drafted because he is a quality indvidual with intelligence and a strong right arm. NFL is color blind when it comes to draft day. You realize that this may back fire. White conservatives are ticket holdrers and if they think the "Reverends" are pushing their buttons too hard....well...what do you think? Remember when Barkley just blew Jackson off when the latter asked him to get a strike going to get more black coaches.? Barkley knew better. .
Posted Tuesday Oct 20, 2009 by Guest;
Diversity is what America should be. Sadly that is not what most conservatives want, Limbaugh it an example. No one is trying to silence him, it would be useless to actually try, so any call that is what is happening is pure BS. Most conservatives fail to recognize that exercising their free speech rights comes with responsibility, accountability. Limbaugh may just be reaping what he has sown long ago. America, Love it or Leave it, has been a montra of those that wish to not be contronted by things they disagree with. America the Beautiful! Is the montra that should be sung!.
Posted Wednesday Oct 21, 2009 by Guest;
Rush is just too darn stupid to be responsible enough to own a NFL team..
Posted Thursday Oct 22, 2009 by Guest;
Rush has made a great living off of being controversial - this is the reason he is now in a position to make a purchase of an NFL team. The laws of this country allow him to make his statements into the marketplace of ideas, and that is all. He is not protected from popular opinion for the statements he has made. The same laws that allow Rush to do his thing allow individuals to protest his statements - that is free speech also. The collective opinion of so many individual reactions has influence, and Rush, and only Rush, is responsible for his collection of both supporters and naysayers. Rush is simply reaping the seeds he has sown; he makes a living being divisive, and ownership and divisiveness simply do not mix, as HIS SAVVY BUSINESS PARTNERS KNOW. It is remarkable to me that a "conservative" who preaches responsibility wishes to defray responsibility on some imaginary liberal other. Just more of his hypocrisy - Oxycontin anyone?.
Posted Tuesday Oct 27, 2009 by Guest;
I could see the new player contracts now saying that said player must be registered and vote for the Republican Party in elections, and that they are giving person to have a member of the Conservative Republicans to be in the voting booth with then telling them how they must vote..
Posted Tuesday Oct 27, 2009 by Guest;
People like Rush who think wrong thoughts shouldn't be allowed to own things. Only those who agree with the staff at diversityinc are worthy enough to be allowed the opportunity to buy property..

Comment on this article   
Name:
E-mail Address:
Comments:*


Career Search


Quick Search Advanced Search